Comments on: Comparision of Human Development index in rural Telangana, Rayalaseema, and Costal Andhra http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/ Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:03:53 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: anigalla.net http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-37943 anigalla.net Thu, 08 Apr 2010 03:37:52 +0000 http://www.drpenna.com/?p=1121#comment-37943 good work. I have done some research on Human development Index in Andhra Pradesh and have posted a same post of this kind earlier. Thanks anyway. good work. I have done some research on Human development Index in Andhra Pradesh and have posted a same post of this kind earlier. Thanks anyway.

]]> By: Mahendra nath http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-33261 Mahendra nath Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:20:07 +0000 http://www.drpenna.com/?p=1121#comment-33261 Good information. Actual conditions may slightly differ. But The districts Like Vizianagaram, Ananthapuram, Srikakulam, and Adilabad are not came in Least 5. This is unbeliavable. The least shown districts in the index like Guntur , Warangal and east godavari are formost better in all aspects compared to Vizianagaram, Ananthapuram, Srikakulam, and Adilabad . Mahaboobnagar is Correctly mentioned. But any have what they taken for measuring this index I dont know but as I visited and stayed almost all parts of Andhra Pradesh I saw a direct Index. But in any aspect the separate Telangana demand is Rubbish and it is only political. Poor and bright students are losing their lifes and valuable education because of ignorence. Development required somany parts of Andhra as I mentioned the districts. Undeveloped districts like Vizianagaram, Srikakulam in Coastal region, Ananthapur in Rayalaseema, Mahaboobnagar, Adilabad in Telangana. So, there is no question of a separate states. But for later on one should think about some good packages and industrial corridors along with basic amenities in these districts. No Telangana, No Rayalaseema, No Uttarcoasta, No Greater Hyderabad. We are UNITED ANDHRA. Good information. Actual conditions may slightly differ. But The districts Like Vizianagaram, Ananthapuram, Srikakulam, and Adilabad are not came in Least 5. This is unbeliavable. The least shown districts in the index like Guntur , Warangal and east godavari are formost better in all aspects compared to Vizianagaram, Ananthapuram, Srikakulam, and Adilabad . Mahaboobnagar is Correctly mentioned.

But any have what they taken for measuring this index I dont know but as I visited and stayed almost all parts of Andhra Pradesh I saw a direct Index.

But in any aspect the separate Telangana demand is Rubbish and it is only political. Poor and bright students are losing their lifes and valuable education because of ignorence. Development required somany parts of Andhra as I mentioned the districts. Undeveloped districts like Vizianagaram, Srikakulam in Coastal region, Ananthapur in Rayalaseema, Mahaboobnagar, Adilabad in Telangana. So, there is no question of a separate states. But for later on one should think about some good packages and industrial corridors along with basic amenities in these districts. No Telangana, No Rayalaseema, No Uttarcoasta, No Greater Hyderabad. We are UNITED ANDHRA.

]]> By: nsssarma http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-31794 nsssarma Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:11:27 +0000 http://www.drpenna.com/?p=1121#comment-31794 I am afraid thatmmere stastics does not reveal the actual conditions existing. for eg. we find Karimnagar and Warangal districts competing with south coastal dists.But truth remains that while The ryots of S.Coastal districts are benefited bu canal irrigation can have 3 crops without much expenditure on theirpart the farmers of K'nagar and W"gl dists depend on bore well irrigation for they have to invest a lot of money.With depletin groun water and irregular poer supply every yr they r incurring huge losses.Same is the case with their Rayalaseema counterparts.Hence we c farmers's suicides more in these regions.The same may b mentioned in regard of industrial development in Rangareddy,Medak dists ,the cause being their contiguiity to Hyderabad city Iam afraid that u r wrong in talking about the development of Chattishghar,and other small states recently created. Statistics prove that all those districts consistently maintained good development since their formation.More in smaller states alone peple can exert mpre pressue on their Govts. as administraton will b nearer to them.Division of the erstwhile taluks into Mandals proved that. In regard of sicerity and dedication of our Politicians It like searhing for apin in haystock.Only peoples pressure bring them towork.And that is easier in small states I am afraid thatmmere stastics does not reveal the actual conditions existing. for eg. we find Karimnagar and Warangal districts competing with south coastal dists.But truth remains that while The ryots of S.Coastal districts are benefited bu canal irrigation can have 3 crops without much expenditure on theirpart the farmers of K’nagar and W”gl dists depend on bore well irrigation for they have to invest a lot of money.With depletin groun water and irregular poer supply every yr they r incurring huge losses.Same is the case with their Rayalaseema counterparts.Hence we c farmers’s suicides more in these regions.The same may b mentioned in regard of industrial development in Rangareddy,Medak dists ,the cause being their contiguiity to Hyderabad city
Iam afraid that u r wrong in talking about the development of Chattishghar,and other small states recently created. Statistics prove that all those districts consistently maintained good development since their formation.More in smaller states alone peple can exert mpre pressue on their Govts. as administraton will b nearer to them.Division of the erstwhile taluks into Mandals proved that. In regard of sicerity and dedication of our Politicians It like searhing for apin in haystock.Only peoples pressure bring them towork.And that is easier in small states

]]> By: chakravarthy devulapally http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-29035 chakravarthy devulapally Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:12:52 +0000 http://www.drpenna.com/?p=1121#comment-29035 I feel that over all development of the State should be seen with National Average. The economic disparities between different districts is due availability of natural resources and human development. These studies are to help the people at the helm of affairs to take corrective steps. coming to the subject, politicians are responsible for the backwardness of the concerned districts. The M.P.s and M.L.A. s are not bothered about their respective districts. Now, they can not raise their voice that somebody is partial towards some districts and neglected others. The assembly sessions are wasted by some of the legislatures irresponsible behavior on unnessary issues and thus useful matters are given proper importance. By creating a separate state there will be more administrative expenditure. Instead let us concentrate on deficiencies and in a planned way the economic disparities can be rectified. The performances of two independent states i.e., Jarkhand and Chattisgarh created few years ago, tells us that creation of separate state do not solve economic development of the population. It is sincerity and dedication of all concerned i.e., politicians and officials in planning and implementing various programs that suit the people of the region. I feel that over all development of the State should be seen with National Average. The economic disparities between different districts is due availability of natural resources and human development. These studies are to help the people at the helm of affairs to take corrective steps.

coming to the subject, politicians are responsible for the backwardness of the concerned districts. The M.P.s and M.L.A. s are not bothered about their respective districts. Now, they can not raise their voice that somebody is partial towards some districts and neglected others. The assembly sessions are wasted by some of the legislatures irresponsible behavior on unnessary issues and thus useful matters are given proper importance.

By creating a separate state there will be more administrative expenditure. Instead let us concentrate on deficiencies and in a planned way the economic disparities can be rectified. The performances of two independent states i.e., Jarkhand and Chattisgarh created few years ago, tells us that creation of separate state do not solve economic development of the population. It is sincerity and dedication of all concerned i.e., politicians and officials in planning and implementing various programs that suit the people of the region.

]]> By: Sreeram Penna http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-25090 Sreeram Penna Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:58:47 +0000 http://www.drpenna.com/?p=1121#comment-25090 Hi Mahmut Maha At first glance looking through tables and figures two interesting points 1. Poverty levels in 2000 rural telangana (20.6) fares better than costal andhra (24.3), rayalaseema (I 33.1, II 22.3) Same with urban telangana but that is due to Hyderabad 2.Infrastructure index 2004 Despite Hyderabad on top many telangana districts are in the bottom part of the table. Infrastructure index according to document is based on availability of facilities, I dont think it mentions Infrastructure per population density. My Idea on this is probably population density. Lower population lower infrastructure. Hi Mahmut Maha

At first glance looking through tables and figures two interesting points

1. Poverty levels in 2000

rural telangana (20.6) fares better than costal andhra (24.3), rayalaseema (I 33.1, II 22.3)

Same with urban telangana but that is due to Hyderabad

2.Infrastructure index 2004

Despite Hyderabad on top many telangana districts are in the bottom part of the table.

Infrastructure index according to document is based on availability of facilities, I dont think it mentions Infrastructure per population density. My Idea on this is probably population density. Lower population lower infrastructure.

]]> By: Mahmut Maha http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-25089 Mahmut Maha Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:28:59 +0000 http://www.drpenna.com/?p=1121#comment-25089 This shows otherwise? Any response please send me. http://aponline.gov.in/Apportal/HumanDevelopmentReport2007/APHDR_2007_Chapter5.pdf This shows otherwise? Any response please send me.

http://aponline.gov.in/Apportal/HumanDevelopmentReport2007/APHDR_2007_Chapter5.pdf

]]> By: Mahmut Maha http://www.drpenna.com/2009/12/16/comparision-of-human-development-index-in-telangana-rayalaseema-and-costal-andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-25073 Mahmut Maha Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:25:54 +0000 http://www.drpenna.com/?p=1121#comment-25073 Good find. One of the guys posted this on facebook and its in wikipedia already.. Good find. One of the guys posted this on facebook and its in wikipedia already..

]]>